9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of whether mining safety lamps qualify as mining machinery for the purpose of claiming relief under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the classification of mining safety lamps as mining machinery for claiming relief under section 80-I. The assessee, a public limited company, manufactured various items, including miner's safety cap lamps. The controversy arose when the Income-tax Officer disallowed the claim under section 80-I for the manufacture of safety cap lamps, stating they were not covered by the Sixth Schedule. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, considering the lamps as mining machinery based on a report by the Coal Council Sub-Committee. The Revenue contended that the lamps did not qualify as major items of specialized equipment. The Tribunal referred to previous orders and affirmed the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision, leading to the current reference to the High Court. The High Court analyzed the relevant provisions of section 80-I and the Sixth Schedule to determine whether mining safety lamps could be classified as mining machinery under item No. (4) of the Sixth Schedule. The Court noted that the legislative classification under the Sixth Schedule restricted industrial machinery to specific items listed under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The Court emphasized the definition of machinery as per legal precedents, requiring mechanical contrivances generating power or directing natural forces. Applying this definition, the Court concluded that mining safety lamps did not qualify as mining machinery but rather as tools or articles used in the mining industry. The Court rejected the assessee's argument for further facts, stating that the issue was a pure question of law regarding the interpretation of a commonly used item. The Court held that the mining safety lamps did not meet the criteria of mining machinery under the Sixth Schedule. Consequently, the Court answered the reference question in the negative, favoring the Revenue. No costs were awarded in the case due to the circumstances. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment clarified the classification of mining safety lamps as tools rather than machinery for the purpose of claiming relief under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the legislative provisions, legal definitions, and the specific characteristics of the lamps in question.
|
