2010 (2) TMI 945 - HC - Income Tax

Whether Tribunal was legally justified in allowing the assessee s claim for deduction on account of rent paid to the hotel close to the factory and transit house in contravention of the provisions of section 37(4) read with section 37(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Tribunal was not justified in allowing the claim for deduction on account of the rent paid by the assessee to the M/s. Modipur Hotels (P) Ltd. and transit house as it contravened the provisions of section 37(4) read with section 37(5) of the Act - In favour of the Revenue Whether the payment made by the assessee towards the membership of the club is an allowable deduction - expenditure was incurred in order to procure business Held that - Intention has to be seen as the amount was spent towards advancement of business - It is a business expenditure and, therefore, has rightly been allowed as it is not specifically covered by any statutory provision wherein it has to be disallowed - In favour of the assessee Claim of bad debts disallowance - assessee thought that it was uneconomical to file suits against such defaulting clients no suits were filed Held that - This alone cannot be a ground for disallowing the claim of bad debts - After amendment to the provisions of section 36(2) read with section 36(1)(vii) of the Act if the amount has been considered for computation of income in the earlier years and the debt has been written off in the books of account it was sufficient to allow the claim of bad debts - assessee has complied with both the requirements, namely, that the amount has been considered for computation of income in the earlier years and the debt has been written off in the books of account In favor of assessee. Whether Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to allow the under section 43B Held that - In the case of Berger Paints India Ltd. (2004 (2) TMI 4 (SC)) it was held that the entire amount of excise duty/customs duty paid by the assessee in a particular accounting year is allowable under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as a deduction in respect of that year, irrespective of the amount of excise duty/customs duty included in the valuation of the assessee s closing stock at the end of the accounting year as relating thereto - In favour of the assessee

Summary

Issues:
1. Deduction of rent paid to the hotel close to the factory and transit house.
2. Deduction of payment towards membership of a club.
3. Deletion of addition on account of bad debts.
4. Allowance of claim under section 43B of the Income-tax Act.

Issue 1: Deduction of rent paid to the hotel close to the factory and transit house:
The appellant, a public company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling photo copiers and toner, claimed a deduction for rent paid to a hotel close to the factory and a transit house. The High Court held that the Tribunal was not justified in allowing this deduction as it contravened the provisions of section 37(4) read with section 37(5) of the Income-tax Act. The court set aside the Tribunal's decision in favor of the Revenue.

Issue 2: Deduction of payment towards membership of a club:
Regarding the deduction of payment made towards the membership of a club, the court found that the expenditure was incurred to procure business, which qualifies as a business expenditure. The court emphasized that the intention behind the expenditure towards the advancement of business is crucial, regardless of the actual business outcome. Consequently, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.

Issue 3: Deletion of addition on account of bad debts:
The Tribunal considered the assessee's wide network of after-sales services involving a significant number of xerox machines on maintenance agreements. Disputes sometimes arose over service charges, leading to short recoveries due to the assessee's decision not to file suits against defaulting clients. The Tribunal held that this alone cannot justify disallowing the claim of bad debts. The court referenced a Supreme Court decision on bad debts and concluded that the Tribunal's findings were factual and in accordance with the law. Therefore, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 4: Allowance of claim under section 43B of the Income-tax Act:
The court noted that the issue regarding the allowance of the claim under section 43B of the Income-tax Act was squarely covered by a Supreme Court decision in the case of Berger Paints India Ltd. The court reiterated the Supreme Court's ruling that the entire amount of excise duty or customs duty paid by the assessee in a particular accounting year is allowable as a deduction under section 43B, irrespective of the amount included in the valuation of the closing stock. Consequently, the court found no error in the Tribunal's decision and answered the question in favor of the assessee, upholding the Tribunal's order.

In conclusion, the High Court partially allowed the appeal, ruling on each issue based on the relevant legal provisions and precedents, ultimately providing a comprehensive analysis and decision on the various substantial questions of law raised by the Revenue.