Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2012 (12) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (12) TMI 647 - AT - Central ExciseClearance of samples without payment of duty - Demand of Duty and Imposition of Penalty u/s 11AC - Held that - As the appellant vide letter dated 7.1.2003 in reply to the Show Cause Notice submitted that the samples were in the form of unpacked tablets and drawn from the bulk prior to packing stage. From this letter, it is clear that the tablets, which are dutiable were cleared without payment of duty from the factory of production. Therefore,no infirmity in the impugned order - against assessee.
Issues:
- Appeal against demand of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for clearing samples without payment of duty. Analysis: The judgment pertains to an appeal filed against an order confirming a demand of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for clearing samples without payment of duty. The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of medicaments, cleared certain samples without duty payment between February 2000 and December 2002. The adjudicating authority upheld the demand and penalty. The appellant contended that the samples, being analytical samples cleared without packaging, were not excisable and hence the demand was unsustainable. The tribunal noted that the samples were indeed cleared without duty payment, a fact not in dispute. The crucial issue was whether these unpacked samples were liable to duty. The tribunal held that even though the samples were cleared without packaging, they were still excisable goods and therefore subject to duty. The appellant's argument that the samples were not marketable due to lack of packaging was rejected. The tribunal highlighted that the tablets, which were dutiable, were cleared without payment of duty from the factory, as confirmed by the appellant's own submission in a letter dated 7.1.2003. Consequently, the tribunal found no error in the impugned order confirming the demand and penalty. In conclusion, the tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for clearing samples without payment of duty. The judgment emphasizes that the excisability of goods is not negated by the absence of packaging, and duty liability extends to such goods even when cleared in unpacked form.
|