Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2013 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (2) TMI 365 - HC - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Quashing of complaint and summoning order under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
2. Validity of criminal proceedings under Section 9 and 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
3. Interpretation of legal precedents regarding concealment of income and penalties.
4. Impact of Tribunal and Apex Court orders on criminal proceedings.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The petitioners sought the quashing of a complaint and summoning order under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The complaint was based on an assessment order dated 18.11.1998, which was later set aside in appeal on 21.3.2000. The petitioners argued that since the assessment order forming the basis of the complaint had been overturned, the criminal proceedings against them should be quashed. Legal counsel relied on the case law precedent of 'K.C.Builders' and 'Gupta Constructions Co.' to support their argument that if penalties have been set aside, the prosecution cannot proceed. The High Court judge noted that the petition deserved dismissal after hearing arguments from both parties.

2. The validity of the criminal proceedings under Section 9 and 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was questioned in the case. The initial assessment order directed the petitioners to deposit penalties, which were later challenged and overturned by the Tribunal in 2000. The Tribunal upheld the classification claimed by the Company, leading to the quashing of penalties and demands. Subsequent appeals and orders from higher judicial forums favored the petitioners, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the complaint and summoning order based on the assessment order.

3. The interpretation of legal precedents regarding concealment of income and penalties played a crucial role in the judgment. The court referenced the 'K.C.Builders' case where the Tribunal's decision to set aside penalties led to the conclusion that there was no concealment in the eyes of the law, rendering the prosecution illegal. Similarly, in 'Gupta Constructions Co.', the Supreme Court held that if penalty proceedings are set aside, the basis for launching prosecution against the assessee is nullified. These precedents were pivotal in determining the abuse of the legal process in the case at hand and the subsequent quashing of the criminal proceedings.

4. The impact of Tribunal and Apex Court orders on criminal proceedings was significant in this case. The Tribunal's decision to quash penalties and demands, upheld by higher judicial forums, including the Apex Court, influenced the High Court's judgment to quash the complaint and summoning order. The court highlighted that the assessment order, which formed the basis of the criminal complaint, had been set aside by superior courts, making the continuation of criminal proceedings an abuse of the legal process. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the complaint along with subsequent proceedings were quashed to put an end to the litigation.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates