9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the issue of whether the liability incurred by the assessee for development expenses in the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74 was a contingent liability or a liability in praesenti, impacting the deduction of such expenses under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Summary: In the case before the High Court of Allahabad, the assessee, a private limited company engaged in colonisation business in Agra, undertook the development of a colony named "Vibhav Nagar" during the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74. The company had deposited sums with the Municipal Committee for development work to be carried out by them, in addition to debiting amounts for development expenses to be undertaken by the company itself. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the estimated liability for development expenses, stating that it was a contingent liability and not incurred by the assessee. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the disallowance, contrary to a similar claim allowed in a previous year. The Tribunal, considering the case akin to the precedent of Calcutta Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1959] 37 ITR 1 (SC), ruled in favor of the assessee, as the expenses were debited only for plots sold in the relevant year, maintaining accounts on a mercantile basis. The judgment clarifies that under similar circumstances as the Supreme Court decision, the liability for development expenses was not contingent but a liability in praesenti, allowing the deduction of Rs. 14,998 and Rs. 1,04,156 for the respective assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, favoring the assessee and rejecting the Revenue's appeal.
|
