9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Valid initiation of proceedings under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 in the case of a dissolved firm; Validity of notice served on one partner of the dissolved firm for assessment purposes; Proper year of assessment for the income of the firm.
Analysis: The High Court of GAUHATI addressed the case of a firm named Supply Agency, which was dissolved in April 1945, and an attempt was made to reopen its income-tax assessment. The Income-tax Officer assessed the firm at a higher amount than reported in the return filed under protest. The issue arose regarding the validity of the notice served on only one partner of the dissolved firm for initiating proceedings under section 34 of the Income-tax Act. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the objection, but the Tribunal disagreed. The Tribunal was requested to refer specific questions of law to the High Court, which it initially refused. The petitioner contended that notice served on one partner of a dissolved firm was not a valid initiation of proceedings under section 34. Citing relevant case law, the petitioner argued that assessments made after the dissolution of a partnership, with notice served on only one partner, may not be considered valid. The High Court refrained from expressing an opinion on the correctness of this contention but acknowledged the question of law regarding the valid initiation of proceedings under section 34 in the case of the dissolved firm Supply Agency. Referring to legal precedents, the Court highlighted the importance of proper initiation of proceedings and notice requirements, especially in cases involving dissolved firms. Drawing parallels with a case involving the assessment of a deceased individual, the Court emphasized the need for valid notices in such scenarios. The Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding the valid initiation of proceedings under section 34 to the High Court for determination. Ultimately, the petition was allowed, and the case was to be referred for further consideration.
|
