9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of deduction under section 80T(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on gross capital gains from the sale of house property. 2. Consideration of long-term capital loss on the sale of shares in computing the deduction under section 80T(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The case involved questions referred to the High Court regarding the interpretation of provisions under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1974-75. The primary issue was whether the assessee was entitled to a deduction under section 80T(b)(i) on the entire amount of long-term capital gains from the sale of a property or only on the net amount after adjusting for capital losses. The assessee contended that section 80T was independent and entitled them to the deduction on the entire amount. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) agreed with the assessee's argument, directing the Income-tax Officer to recompute the total income based on the gross amount of capital gains. The Revenue challenged this decision, arguing that the deduction under section 80T should not be allowed on capital gains before adjusting for capital losses brought forward from previous years. However, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, citing differing views and the principle of interpreting fiscal statutes favorably towards the taxpayer. The High Court considered relevant precedents and provisions under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the need to compute total income under each head before considering deductions under Chapter VI-A. The Court highlighted the importance of setting off losses and computing income in accordance with the Act before applying special deductions. Referring to the Supreme Court decisions in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. and Distributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd., the Court emphasized the correct interpretation of provisions under Chapter VI-A and the necessity to compute total income before allowing deductions. The Court also mentioned section 80B(5) which defines gross total income as computed before deductions under Chapter VI-A. Additionally, the Court noted the relevance of sections 72 and 74 concerning carry forward and set off of losses under different heads of income. In conclusion, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that total income must be computed in accordance with the Act before allowing deductions under Chapter VI-A. The Court emphasized the sequential process of computing income under each head, setting off losses, and then considering special deductions. Therefore, both questions in the reference were answered negatively in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs.
|
