Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1989 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1989 (2) TMI 30 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Determination of whether the loss on the sale of shares of British India Corporation is a revenue loss or a trading loss.
2. Assessment of the nature of transactions in shares of British India Corporation by Jessop and Co. Ltd.

Analysis:
The High Court of Calcutta was presented with two questions under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The primary issue was whether the loss incurred by Jessop and Co. Ltd. on the sale of 3,25,000 shares of British India Corporation should be considered a revenue loss or a trading loss. The Income-tax Officer initially disallowed the deduction of the loss, stating that the transactions were speculative in nature and not intended for delivery of shares. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner also found that the shares were not acquired for normal trading purposes, leading to the disallowance of the loss claimed by the assessee.

The Tribunal's decision was deemed unsatisfactory by the High Court due to its reliance on the pending suit in the High Court to determine the nature of the transactions. The Court emphasized that the assessment of a trading loss should be based on the facts and circumstances at the time of the claim. The Tribunal's failure to consider crucial facts, such as the involvement of a single director in both companies and the treatment of shares as investments in the balance sheets, was highlighted as a misapplication of judgment.

As a result, the High Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal for a fresh review, directing a comprehensive assessment of all facts presented before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Court emphasized the importance of examining the motives behind the share transactions and determining whether they align with normal commercial activities. The second question raised was left unanswered, pending the Tribunal's reassessment of whether the loss qualifies as a trading loss.

In conclusion, the High Court's decision focused on the need for a thorough evaluation of the facts and legal issues surrounding the transactions in shares of British India Corporation by Jessop and Co. Ltd. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for a more detailed analysis, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant facts before reaching a conclusion on the nature of the loss claimed by the assessee.

Judges' Decisions:
- Justice Suhas Chandra Sen: Directed remand of the case to the Tribunal for a fresh review.
- Justice Baboo Lall Jain: Concurred with Justice Suhas Chandra Sen's decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates