Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2013 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (10) TMI 1019 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
Interpretation of Section 8(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act regarding the rate of tax applicable on inter-state sale of goods manufactured from tax paid raw material.

Analysis:
The High Court of Allahabad heard a revision filed by the department against the Tribunal's order related to the assessment year 1995-96 under the Central Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal had held that the rate of tax on inter-state sale of Iron & Steel manufactured from tax paid raw material would be 2% based on the certificate in Form C provided by the assessee. However, the department contended that the proviso to Section 8(1) was misread by the Tribunal, as it mandates a 4% tax rate in the absence of a notification specifying a 2% rate. The assessee argued that since Form C was submitted, satisfying Section 8(4), the 2% tax rate applied to intra-state sales should also apply to inter-state sales.

The Court noted that the goods were manufactured from tax paid raw material and sold within the State of U.P at a 2% tax rate as per a notification. The key issue was whether the inter-state sale of goods manufactured by the assessee should be taxed at 2% under Section 8(1) or at 4% as per the proviso. Section 8(1) specifies a 2% tax rate unless a notification states otherwise, in which case the proviso mandates a 4% rate until the 2% rate is notified. The absence of a notification would trigger the proviso, resulting in a 4% tax rate for inter-state sales.

The Court clarified that without a notification specifying a 2% tax rate for inter-state sales, the proviso to Section 8(1) would apply, necessitating a 4% tax rate. Since no such notification was presented in the case, the Tribunal's decision to tax at 2% was legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Court quashed the impugned order, restoring the second appeal to the Tribunal for a fresh decision within three months in accordance with the law and the Court's observations.

In conclusion, the High Court of Allahabad allowed the revision, emphasizing the importance of a notification under Section 8(1) for determining the applicable tax rate on inter-state sales of goods manufactured from tax paid raw material under the Central Sales Tax Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates