1989 (3) TMI 83 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Entitlement to investment allowance under section 32A on the plant freezer.
2. Consideration of the assessee being engaged in the production of an article.

The High Court of Kerala addressed the issue of entitlement to investment allowance under section 32A on the plant freezer and whether the assessee should be considered engaged in the production of an article. The respondent, an income-tax assessee, purchased seafood, processed it, and exported it after installing a "plant freezer." The assessee claimed investment allowance, which was initially disallowed by the Income-tax Officer. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner accepted the plea based on the amendment of section 32A applicable for the year in question. The Revenue contended that the assessee was not manufacturing any article, but the Tribunal, citing precedents, held that the assessee should be considered engaged in the production of an article. The court observed that the processing of prawns amounted to the production of an article, making the deduction claimed permissible under section 32A(2)(b)(iii). Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues, affirming the Tribunal's decision. The judgment emphasized that the processing of prawns constituted production of an article, entitling the assessee to the deduction claimed. The court concluded by answering both questions in the affirmative, against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee, and directed the judgment to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.