2013 (12) TMI 363 - HC - Income Tax

Tax effect - Held that - As per Board Circular dated 27.3.2000 issued under Section 268A of the Act - The monetary limit has been fixed for filing an appeal under various forums and the limit fixed for this High Court is four lakhs - The tax effect in the present case is less than prescribed limit - Decided against Revenue.

Summary

Issues:
1. Addition of Rs.2,00,000/- for payment of 'on money' for purchase of flat no.208.
2. Interpretation of surrounding circumstances to determine reality in income tax cases.
3. Consideration of ITAT decision in confirming additions based on statements of one party.
4. Application of Section 158 BD in cases involving undisclosed income.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The appeal challenged the addition of Rs.2,00,000/- on the grounds of payment of 'on money' for the purchase of a flat. The Tribunal had deleted this addition, prompting the Revenue to file the appeal. The Tribunal was criticized for not adequately considering the material presented by the Assessing Officer and the information available related to evidence found during a search operation.

Issue 2:
The appeal raised the question of whether the Tribunal erred in not appreciating the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT West Bengal II vs. Durga Prasad More, emphasizing the authority of income tax authorities to examine surrounding circumstances to ascertain the reality of a transaction. This issue highlighted the importance of considering the broader context in income tax matters.

Issue 3:
The Tribunal's decision was also challenged based on its failure to appreciate a three-member bench decision of the ITAT, Pune, in the case of Dhunjibhoy Stud & Agricultural Farm vs. Dy. CIT. In this case, additions based on 'on money' were confirmed primarily on the statement of one party, despite denial by the other party. The issue of reliance on statements and the weight given to such evidence was a key point of contention.

Issue 4:
The final issue revolved around the Tribunal's interpretation of the decision of the Gujarat High Court regarding the application of Section 158 BD in cases involving undisclosed income. The Gujarat High Court's stance on the prima facie satisfaction required by the Assessing Officer in such cases was cited to challenge the Tribunal's decision not to uphold the addition based on seized material indicating payment of 'on money' for the flat in question.

The judgment ultimately dismissed the appeal, with the High Court emphasizing the monetary limit for filing an appeal under various forums as per the Board Circular. The Court found the tax effect in this case to be less than the prescribed limit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.