9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 104(4)(a) and the Explanation in relation to the profit obtained from the sale of imported chemicals by an Indian company engaged in the manufacture of leather. Analysis: The judgment addressed the question of whether the profit obtained by the assessee from the sale of chemicals imported based on its export performance of leather was rightly held as not attributable to its manufacturing activity. The court considered section 104(4)(a) and the Explanation, which define when a company's business is deemed to consist mainly of manufacturing or processing goods. The Explanation states that if the income attributable to manufacturing activities is not less than fifty-one percent of the total income, the business is considered mainly in manufacturing. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and exporting leather goods, argued that the profit from the sale of chemicals should be attributed to its manufacturing activity. However, the court found that the connection between the income from the sale of imported chemicals and the manufacturing of leather goods was not sufficiently proximate. The court referred to a previous case involving the same assessee and held that the income was not attributable to the manufacturing process of leather. Based on the above analysis, the court answered the question in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Revenue was awarded costs, including counsel's fee. The judgment will be communicated to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras Bench for further action.
|
