2013 (12) TMI 904 - AT - Income Tax

Applicability of section 50C - Held that - Following ACIT Vs. P.R.Chockalingam 2012 (4) TMI 417 - ITAT CHENNAI - The value of the property should be determined at the time of handing over of possession of the property and not at the time of registration - The value should be determined in accordance with the terms and conditions mentioned in MOU between the assessee and the developer - The provisions of Section 50C will not be applicable as they were inserted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 01-04-2003 - Decided against Revenue.

Summary

Issues:
1. Applicability of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Determination of property value for capital gains calculation.
3. Interpretation of the timing of property transfer for tax purposes.

Applicability of Section 50C:
The appeal before the ITAT Chennai involved a dispute over the applicability of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue contended that the Assessing Officer correctly applied Section 50C in determining the value of the property based on registered documents. On the other hand, the assessee argued that the transaction occurred before the provision of Section 50C came into force. The ITAT examined the case in light of the provisions and relevant legal precedents. It was noted that the transaction was conducted before the enactment of Section 50C, and thus, the value should be determined based on the terms of the agreement between the parties. The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT(Appeals) and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this issue.

Determination of Property Value:
The dispute also centered around the determination of the property value for calculating capital gains. The Assessing Officer had invoked Section 50C to ascertain the capital gains, which was challenged by the assessee before the CIT(Appeals). The CIT(Appeals) directed the Assessing Officer to consider the actual consideration received by the assessee as per the agreement with the developer, rather than the guideline value. The ITAT, in its analysis, emphasized that the value of the property should be determined at the time of handing over possession and not at the time of registration. The ITAT relied on the decision in the case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria and concluded that the provisions of Section 50C were not applicable to the present case. Therefore, the ITAT confirmed the decision of the CIT(Appeals) on this issue.

Interpretation of Property Transfer Timing:
The ITAT further delved into the interpretation of the timing of property transfer for tax purposes. Citing the case of ACIT Vs. P.R.Chockalingam, the ITAT highlighted the significance of the NOC issuance date and the sequence of events leading to the property transfer. The ITAT observed that the NOC issued related back to an earlier date, reinforcing the fact of property transfer on a specific date. The ITAT concluded that the Revenue failed to challenge the findings of the CIT(Appeals and upheld the order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on the grounds of merit. The judgment was pronounced on October 21, 2013, by the ITAT Chennai.

---