9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (1) TMI 813 - HC - Income TaxWhether excise duty be included in total turnover for the purpose of Section 80HHC - Held that - Following Commissioner of IncomeTax vs. Lakshmi Machine Works 2007 (4) TMI 202 - SUPREME Court - Under Section 2(24) of the Act the word income includes profits and gains - The charge is not on gross receipts but on profits and gains - Gross receipts or sale proceeds, however, include profits - Such profits have to be got to be ascertained on ordinary principles of commercial trading and accounting - Profits should be computed after deducting the expenses incurred for business though such expenses may not be admissible expressly under the Act, unless such expenses are expressly disallowed by the Act - Therefore, schematic interpretation for making the formula in Section 80HHC workable cannot be ruled out. Just as interest, commission etc. did not emanate from the turnover , so also excise duty and sales tax did not emanate from such turnover - Since excise duty and sales tax did not involve any such turnover, such taxes had to be excluded - Excise duty and sales tax are indirect taxes. They are recovered by the assessee on behalf of the Government - Decided against Revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that Sales Tax and excise duty cannot be included in working out total turnover for the purpose of Section 80HHC? Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Inclusion of Sales Tax and Excise Duty in Total Turnover for Section 80HHC: The primary issue in this case is whether sales tax and excise duty should be included in the total turnover for the purpose of calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue challenged the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which excluded these components from the total turnover. Legal Precedents: The Gujarat High Court referred to the Supreme Court's decisions in *Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Lakshmi Machine Works* and *Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shiva Tex Yarn Ltd.*. The Supreme Court in these cases held that sales tax and excise duty do not form part of the total turnover for the purposes of Section 80HHC. The rationale was that these taxes do not have any nexus with the activity of exports and are collected by the assessee on behalf of the government. Arguments by Revenue: The Revenue's counsel, Mr. Varun K. Patel, argued that the Supreme Court had not considered Section 145A of the Income Tax Act in its previous decisions. However, the court noted that there had been no amendment in Section 80HHC that would alter the applicability of the Supreme Court's observations in *Lakshmi Machine Works*. Court's Analysis: The court reiterated that the issue is no longer res integra (an undecided legal question) and is squarely covered against the Revenue by the Supreme Court's decisions. The court emphasized the purpose of Section 80HHC, which is to provide incentives for export profits and not to include taxes like sales tax and excise duty, which do not involve any element of turnover. Supreme Court's Observations: The Supreme Court had pointed out that the term "total turnover" should be interpreted schematically to exclude components that do not involve turnover, such as excise duty and sales tax. The court noted that these taxes are indirect and collected on behalf of the government, thus should not be part of the total turnover for the purpose of calculating export profits under Section 80HHC. Conclusion: Applying the Supreme Court's ratio in *Lakshmi Machine Works* and *Shiva Tex Yarn Ltd.*, the Gujarat High Court held that the ITAT did not err in excluding excise duty and sales tax from the total turnover for the purpose of Section 80HHC. Consequently, the tax appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming that these taxes should not be included in the total turnover for the computation of the deduction under Section 80HHC. Judgment: The Tax Appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. The court upheld the ITAT's decision that excise duty and sales tax should be excluded from the total turnover for the purpose of Section 80HHC deduction.
|
