1989 (3) TMI 130 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Taxability of interest income earned by the assessee prior to the commencement of business.
2. Whether interest income should be set off against interest expenses during the construction period.

Analysis:
Issue 1: The primary issue in this case was the taxability of interest income earned by the assessee prior to the commencement of business. The Income-tax Officer initially held that the interest income of Rs. 50,116 was taxable as the assessee's income. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that the interest income earned before the commencement of production was not taxable. The Tribunal upheld this decision, leading to the reference to the High Court. The question was reframed to focus on the interest income from January 1, 1977, to April 30, 1977, amounting to Rs. 13,321. The Revenue argued that such income should be taxable, citing relevant case laws. On the other hand, the assessee contended that interest income should be set off against interest expenses as per accounting rules.

Issue 2: The second issue revolved around whether the interest income should be set off against interest expenses during the construction period. The Tribunal did not find any evidence that the assessee had incurred interest expenses during the construction period. The assessee argued that interest income should be set off against related expenses, but the Tribunal did not find a direct correlation between the interest income and any specific expenditure. The High Court distinguished previous case laws cited by both parties and emphasized the need for a direct relationship between income and expenditure for set off. Without such a connection, the High Court held that the interest income was taxable as the assessee's income.

In conclusion, the High Court ruled against the assessee, stating that in the absence of a direct relationship between the interest income and any specific expenditure, the interest income earned on fixed deposits and late payment of call money was taxable. The court emphasized the importance of establishing a clear link between income and expenditure for set off. The parties were directed to bear their own costs in the reference.