2014 (3) TMI 186 - HC - Income Tax

Cancellation of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act - Whether the Tribunal is justified in cancelling the penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act inspite of the fact that the quantum appeal is kept alive by the same ITAT Bench Held that - Assessee was unable to controvert the facts thus, the very basis of the Tribunal s order on penalty disappears - when the Tribunal linked the issue of penalty with the order of CIT A dated 13th July 2011 and the order itself was later on setaside then, of course with consequential directions, the Tribunal s order dated 4th May 2012 requires reconsideration thus, the present order is also set aside and the matter remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration Decided in favour of Revenue.

Summary

Issues:
1. Challenge to the cancellation of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Analysis:
The main issue in this case revolved around the cancellation of a penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue challenged the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the cancellation of the penalty. The Tribunal had directed the Assessing Officer to first give effect to the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and then levy a penalty only on the amount of addition/disallowance sustained after the appeal effect. The Tribunal declined to interfere with the CIT(A)'s order, considering it fair and reasonable. However, it was later revealed that the order of the CIT(A) dated 13th July 2011, which was referenced in the Tribunal's judgment, had been set aside with further directions. The Tribunal rejected a Misc. Application highlighting this fact, stating it lacked review powers. As a result, the basis of the Tribunal's penalty cancellation order was undermined. Therefore, the High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the case back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration and disposal in accordance with the law, emphasizing the need for a reevaluation after considering all relevant facts and directions.

This case highlights the importance of ensuring that decisions are made based on accurate and up-to-date information, especially in matters involving tax penalties. The High Court's decision to remand the case back to the Tribunal emphasizes the need for a thorough review of all relevant facts and legal provisions to ensure a just and lawful outcome. The case serves as a reminder of the significance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax-related matters, underscoring the need for meticulous consideration of all aspects before reaching a final decision.