Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2014 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (5) TMI 421 - AT - Service TaxCENVAT Credit - Revenue contends that when there is change in classification of the service provider and the service provided become exempted one, no cenvat credit shall be admissible - Assessee contends that what that is the classification in the hands of the service provider is of no relevance of the service recipient - Held that - Nowhere the order shows about non-payment of Service Tax. It may be stated that nothing due to State cannot be collected and every due to the State cannot be sacrificed. Once the Service Tax element in terms of the aforesaid pages has come to treasury, there is no bar to grant Cenvat credit which pertains to the service availed by the appellant without any dispute of use in manufacture - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues:
1. Entitlement to Cenvat credit for service tax paid by the appellant. 2. Admissibility of Cenvat credit when the service provider's classification changes. 3. Relevance of service provider's classification to service recipient for Cenvat credit eligibility. Entitlement to Cenvat Credit: The appellant claimed entitlement to Cenvat credit for the service tax paid, supported by documents showing payment to the service provider. The counsel argued that the tax paid should allow the appellant to claim the credit. The adjudication order confirmed the payment of Service Tax by the appellant, emphasizing that once the tax reaches the treasury, there should be no hindrance to granting Cenvat credit. The order highlighted the importance of not sacrificing any dues to the State and allowed the appeal, acknowledging the service availed by the appellant without dispute of use in manufacture. Admissibility of Cenvat Credit with Service Provider Classification Change: The Departmental Representative (DR) contended that if the service provider's classification changes to an exempted category, Cenvat credit should not be granted. In response, the appellant argued that the service recipient's classification is irrelevant to the service provider's classification. The order did not indicate any non-payment of Service Tax by the appellant. It was emphasized that the tax paid should enable the appellant to claim Cenvat credit, especially when there is no dispute regarding the service's use in manufacturing. The order highlighted that every due to the State should not be sacrificed, supporting the appellant's entitlement to the credit. Relevance of Service Provider's Classification for Cenvat Credit Eligibility: The argument revolved around the significance of the service provider's classification change and its impact on the appellant's Cenvat credit eligibility. The appellant maintained that the service recipient's entitlement to credit should not be affected by the service provider's classification. The order focused on the clarity of the payment of Service Tax by the appellant and the absence of any indication of non-payment. It stressed that the tax reaching the treasury should enable the appellant to claim Cenvat credit without hindrance, especially when there is no dispute regarding the service's utilization in manufacturing. The decision favored the appellant's position, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the importance of not sacrificing any dues to the State.
|