2014 (8) TMI 682 - HC - Income Tax

Sale of detachable warrants (DW) - assessee claimed that since the cost of acquisition of detachable warrants is not ascertainable, the sale proceeds of these detachable warrants constitutes capital receipts not liable to tax - tribunal found that the assessee incurred cost of ₹ 9,94,356 for DWs allotted to it under the scheme New Ground in appeal before High Court - Held that - the first question, the third and the fourth questions framed at the time of admission, are on the question as to whether the findings of the learned Tribunal are perverse. We have enquired of Mr. Murarka to show that as to how are the findings perverse, to which his reply was that the relevant evidence was ignored. We requested Mr. Murarka to find out from the memorandum of appeal any ground alleging that any particular piece of evidence was ignored by the Tribunal. He replied that there is no such ground taken in the memorandum of appeal. He has even otherwise not been able to satisfy us that the view taken either by the Income-tax Officer or by the learned Appellate Tribunal is otherwise than on the basis of the evidence. The view taken both by the Income-tax Officer and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is a reasonable view in the facts and circumstances of the case. Decided against Assessee.

Summary

Issues:
1. Assessment of short-term capital loss on the sale of non-convertible debentures and detachable warrants.
2. Taxability of detachable warrants received by the assessee.
3. Interpretation of relevant legal precedents in determining tax liability.

Analysis:
1. The case involved the assessment of short-term capital loss claimed by the assessee on the sale of non-convertible debentures and detachable warrants. The assessee contended that the application money paid for the debentures constituted a loss, which should be allowed as a short-term capital loss. However, the Revenue rejected this claim, stating that the application money was for acquiring detachable warrants, and hence, the loss was disallowed. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue's decision, leading to the present appeal.

2. The assessee argued that the detachable warrants were received at no cost and should not be considered taxable income. The court disagreed, emphasizing that the warrants were received against the application money paid for the debentures. Legal precedents cited by the assessee were deemed inapplicable as they involved different factual scenarios, unlike the present case where the debentures were purchased solely for obtaining the warrants.

3. The court addressed the legal precedents cited by the assessee, highlighting that they were not relevant to the case at hand. The judgments from the Andhra Pradesh High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High Court dealt with distinct factual situations concerning assets acquired in the course of business activities, unlike the present case involving the purchase of debentures for obtaining detachable warrants. The court found the view taken by the Tribunal and the Income-tax Officer to be reasonable based on the evidence presented, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's decision regarding the tax treatment of the debentures and detachable warrants, emphasizing the applicability of the law to the specific facts of the case.