Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2014 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (9) TMI 471 - HC - Customs


Issues:
1. Appeal challenging the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2. Requirement of sending representative samples to testing laboratory for importing toys.
3. Compliance with DGFT Notification and testing guidelines.
4. Lack of details on packaging materials leading to confiscation of goods.
5. Dispute over the necessity of further testing of imported toys.
6. Agreement for testing on a sample basis by Indian Institute of Technology.

Analysis:
Issue 1: The appellant filed an appeal challenging the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The primary issue raised was regarding the import of toys from China and the compliance with the requirements of DGFT Notification.

Issue 2: The main issue before the court was whether representative samples of toys needed to be sent to a testing laboratory for verification before allowing the import. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal emphasized the importance of testing the goods to ensure compliance with standards.

Issue 3: The Commissioner (Appeals) relied on CBEC guidelines mandating the sending of representative samples to certified laboratories for testing. The Tribunal upheld this decision, directing the release of goods if they conform to specified standards after testing in accordance with DGFT Notification.

Issue 4: The Tribunal confirmed the confiscation of plastic toys imported from China due to the lack of details on the packaging materials. While no penalty was imposed on the importer, the Commissioner (Appeals) emphasized the importance of following testing guidelines to establish the link between goods and certificates.

Issue 5: The appellant/importer argued against the necessity of further testing, stating that the primary document had already been submitted. However, the Department insisted on testing to ensure compliance with the Standards of Weights and Measures.

Issue 6: The appellant/importer agreed to testing on a sample basis by the Indian Institute of Technology. To expedite the resolution, the court directed the sending of representative samples to IIT Chennai for testing, with the cost to be borne by the appellant.

In conclusion, the High Court of Madras disposed of the appeal by directing the testing of representative samples at the Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, to verify compliance with standards, emphasizing the importance of following testing procedures to resolve the dispute over the import of toys effectively.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates