Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2014 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (11) TMI 673 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Denial of CENVAT credit on broadcasting service availed by the appellant.
2. Imposition of equal penalty by the adjudicating authority.
3. Appeal for waiver of predeposit and stay on recovery.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Denial of CENVAT credit on broadcasting service
The appellant, a manufacturer of detergent products, availed CENVAT credit on advertisement and broadcasting services. The adjudicating authority denied the credit on broadcasting service as ineligible, amounting to Rs. 24,05,904, and imposed a penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision. The appellant argued that the advertising agencies, registered for rendering advertisement services, passed on the credit for broadcasting services without paying service tax directly. They cited precedents and a Tribunal decision in a similar case, supporting their claim that they are eligible for the credit. The Tribunal found that the appellant had indeed availed broadcasting services through advertising agencies, which invoiced for design/content development and broadcasting charges reimbursement. Referring to a previous case involving Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that the appellant had borne the Service Tax incidence on broadcasting service and was eligible for CENVAT credit.

Issue 2: Imposition of equal penalty
The appellant's contention was that the broadcasting service was crucial for advertising their products, and the advertising agencies passed on the credit without directly paying service tax. The Tribunal's analysis of the invoices and the appellant's transactions confirmed that the appellant had indeed availed and borne the Service Tax on broadcasting services. Therefore, the Tribunal found no merit in the penalty imposed and allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant had a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit, leading to the waiver of the tax, interest, and penalty amount, with the recovery stayed until the appeal's disposal.

Issue 3: Appeal for waiver of predeposit and stay on recovery
The Tribunal's decision was based on the appellant's fulfillment of the conditions for CENVAT credit eligibility on broadcasting services. The Tribunal's detailed analysis of the transactions, along with the precedent involving Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., supported the appellant's claim. As a result, the Tribunal granted the waiver of predeposit and stayed the recovery of the tax, interest, and penalty amount until the appeal's final resolution.

This comprehensive analysis of the issues involved in the judgment highlights the Tribunal's decision to grant relief to the appellant based on the eligibility for CENVAT credit on broadcasting services and the absence of merit in the penalty imposition.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates