Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (12) TMI 139 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance u/s 14A Computation of average interest under Rule 8D @ 0.5% - Held that - The assessee is mainly engaged in the hotel business - It has made investment in the shares and mutual funds on which it has earned dividend income - surplus funds were sufficient to cover the investments - the assessee has also given the nature of utilization of loan and details of interest paid which has been incorporated - for the purpose of indirect expenses the assessee has given the calculation of expenditure from its account which can be said to be attributable for the purpose of earning of the exempt income once all these details were made available along with the entire accounts of the assessee the AO was required to record his satisfaction or satisfied himself that having regard to the accounts of the assessee the claim of the assessee in respect of expenditure debited is not correct and there could have been certain other expenditures which can be said to have been incurred in relation to the earning of exempt income. The A.O. has straight away proceeded to apply Rule 8-D for the purpose of disallowance u/s 14A without satisfying or complying with the mandatory requirement of section 14A(2) or Rule 8-D(1) - once the AO has failed to comply the statutory requirement then he cannot proceed to make the disallowance u/s 14A(1) and the disallowance made by the AO and partly sustained by the CIT(A) over and above the disallowance made by the assessee is deleted Decided in favour of assessee. Computation of book profits u/s 115JB Held that - As admitted by both the parties once the disallowance u/s 14A has been made then the same disallowance shall also form part of the computation while calculating the book profit u/s 115JB of the Act - Thus the disallowance as made by the assessee in its computation of income will be the disallowance while computing the book profit u/s 115JB Decided partly in favour of assessee. Treatment of forfeiture of share application money for equity warrants Capital receipt or revenue receipt Applicability of the SC s decision in Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus TV Sundaram Iyengar And Sons Limited 1996 (9) TMI 1 - SUPREME Court - Held that - During the FY 2007-08 the assessee company had issued equity warrants convertible into equity shares under preferential issue to the public in accordance with SEBI Guidelines 2000 - the assessee treated it as capital receipt and therefore it was not offered as income - In the case of T.V. Sundaram Iyengar secondly the assessee has not forfeited the amount and transferred to the P&L account but directly to the capital reserve under the head warrant forfeited account - The assessee is not in the business of raising money through issue of share warrant and it is not a receipt in the normal course of business - If a particular amount is not received as trading receipt or during the course of trading transaction it cannot be later on treated as arising out of trading transaction so as to hold as revenue receipt thus the amount of forfeited share application money transferred to warrant forfeiture account in the capital reserve is a capital receipt only and cannot be taxed as income of the assessee either u/s 28(iv) or u/s 41(1) Decided in favour of assessee.
|