Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2014 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (12) TMI 916 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
Service tax demand upheld for management, maintenance or repair services provided to organizations like IIT Kanpur, Reserve Bank of India Kanpur, Power Grid Corporation Kanpur, and Hindustan Aeronautical Limited. Appellants claim services to IIT Kanpur not liable to service tax due to retrospective amendment and classification under works contract service pre-01.06.2007.

Analysis:
The appellants filed a stay application and appeal against the Order-In-Appeal upholding a service tax demand of Rs. 7,70,407 along with interest and penalties for services provided to various organizations. The original adjudicating authority confirmed a higher demand, but the Commissioner (Appeals) reduced it, upholding the demand only in relation to management, maintenance, or repair services provided to IIT Kanpur.

The appellants argued that services to IIT Kanpur should not be subject to service tax due to a retrospective amendment exempting management, maintenance, or repair of non-commercial Government buildings until a specific date. They also claimed that services under composite contracts involving goods supply should be treated as works contract service only from 01.06.2007, making pre-2007 services not liable to service tax.

The Tribunal considered the contentions and found it incorrect to assume that services rendered before 01.06.2007 would not be liable to service tax just because they could be classified as works contract service post-01.06.2007. Regarding the exemption claimed for services to IIT Kanpur under the retrospective amendment, the Tribunal clarified that the benefit applied only to non-commercial Government buildings, which did not include IIT Kanpur as it is not a government entity. Therefore, the retrospective amendment did not apply to the appellants' services.

The Tribunal noted that a detailed analysis of all facts and contentions would be done during the final hearing but found that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case justifying the waiver of pre-deposit of the demanded service tax and interest. As a result, the Tribunal ordered the pre-deposit of the service tax and proportionate interest within four weeks, with compliance due by a specified date. However, further interest and penalties were waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency upon compliance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates