Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2015 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (5) TMI 441 - HC - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for export benefits under the Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojana (VKUY) for exports made between 1st April 2004 and 31st March 2007.
2. Interpretation of policy circular dated 28th February 2006 and its effective date.
3. Classification of Menthol and Mentha Oil under the VKUY.
4. Allegations of arbitrary and discriminatory cutoff dates violating Article 14.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Export Benefits under VKUY for Exports Made Between 1st April 2004 and 31st March 2007:
The petitioners, exporters of Menthol and Mentha Oil, claimed benefits under the VKUY from 1st April 2004, arguing that their products fell under the generic description "Minor Forest Produce and their value-added products" in the foreign trade policy effective from 1st April 2004. They contended that the specific products were only listed later due to delayed notifications. However, the respondents argued that the petitioners' products were not explicitly listed under Appendix 37A until 1st April 2007, thus not qualifying for benefits prior to this date.

2. Interpretation of Policy Circular Dated 28th February 2006 and Its Effective Date:
The VKUY aimed to promote exports of various agricultural and forest products, with items being added or altered annually. The petitioners argued that the policy's generic terms should cover their products from the policy's inception. Conversely, the respondents maintained that only products explicitly listed in Appendix 37A were eligible for benefits, and the petitioners' products were not included until the 2007-08 supplement.

3. Classification of Menthol and Mentha Oil under VKUY:
The petitioners argued that their products, derived from Mentha Arvensis, should be covered under the generic description of minor forest produce. They cited the inclusion of "value-added products" in policy descriptions as evidence that their products were always intended to be covered. The respondents countered that the specific listing of value-added products of Mentha only occurred in the 2007-08 supplement, thus benefits could not be retroactively applied.

4. Allegations of Arbitrary and Discriminatory Cutoff Dates Violating Article 14:
The petitioners claimed that the cutoff date of 1st April 2007 for benefits was arbitrary and violated Article 14, as the policy was effective from 1st April 2004. They argued that the delayed listing of their products was a procedural issue and should not affect their eligibility. The respondents defended the cutoff date as a valid policy decision, emphasizing that the policy explicitly stated that not all minor forest produce would qualify for benefits and that specific products would be notified separately.

Judgment:
The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the respondents' position that the petitioners' products were only eligible for VKUY benefits from 1st April 2007. The court found no arbitrariness in the policy's implementation and concluded that only products explicitly listed in Appendix 37A were eligible for benefits. The challenge to the policy circular dated 28th February 2006 was rejected, and the court ruled that the petitioners were not entitled to benefits for the period from 1st April 2004 to 31st March 2007.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates