9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (6) TMI 438 - AT - Income TaxClaim deduction u/s 80IA - whether the earlier year losses of the eligible unit can be set off against the profit of the said unit in this year, when the assessee has exercised to chose the initial assessment year from A.Y. 2009-10? - Held that - As relying on case of M/s. Shevie Exports Vs. JCIT 2013 (5) TMI 16 - ITAT MUMBAI we hold that the assessee s claim for deduction u/s 80IA is allowable from the profits derived from the Windmill unit, starting from A.Y. 2009-10, which is the initial assessment year chosen by the assessee. The earlier year losses cannot be set off against the profits for eligible units in this year. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of deduction under Section 80IA. 2. Treatment of losses from earlier years in relation to Section 80IA. 3. Interpretation of "initial assessment year" under Section 80IA post Finance Act, 1999. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80IA: The Assessee appealed against the order dated 16.04.2013, passed by the CIT(A)-17, which confirmed the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IA by the AO. The AO disallowed the deduction on the grounds that the assessee had already set off losses from previous years against the normal business income and was now claiming a deduction for 100% of the profit derived from the windmill unit for the A.Y. 2009-10. The AO argued that the assessee was receiving dual benefits, as the losses had already been set off against other business incomes in the previous years. 2. Treatment of Losses from Earlier Years in Relation to Section 80IA: The core issue was whether the losses from earlier years should be set off against the profits of the eligible business (windmill unit) when the assessee chose A.Y. 2009-10 as the "initial assessment year." The AO held that the losses incurred in earlier years should be set off against the profits of the eligible business, thereby reducing the profits eligible for deduction under Section 80IA to nil. 3. Interpretation of "Initial Assessment Year" under Section 80IA Post Finance Act, 1999: The Assessee argued that under the amended Section 80IA, effective from 1st April 2000, the "initial assessment year" could be chosen by the assessee, and only the losses incurred from that chosen year should be considered for set-off. The Assessee cited the Karnataka High Court's decision in Velayudha Swami Spinning Mill Pvt. Ltd. and the Madras High Court's decision in CIT Vs. Emerald Jewel Industries, which supported the view that earlier losses already set off against other incomes should not be notionally brought forward. Tribunal's Analysis and Judgment: The Tribunal carefully considered the rival submissions, facts of the case, and relevant judicial decisions. It noted that the issue was whether earlier year losses of the eligible unit could be set off against the profit of the said unit when the assessee chose A.Y. 2009-10 as the initial assessment year. The Tribunal referred to the case of M/s. Shevie Export, which had a similar issue and held that the losses prior to the initial assessment year, which had already been set off, could not be brought forward and adjusted within the ten-year period chosen by the assessee. The Tribunal explained that Section 80IA(5) is a non-obstante clause, which means the profits and gains of an eligible business should be computed as if it were the only source of income from the initial assessment year. The definition of "initial assessment year" was removed by the Finance Act, 1999, allowing the assessee to choose any year within 15 years from the commencement of the business. The Tribunal emphasized that only the losses incurred from the initial assessment year should be considered for set-off, not the losses from prior years that had already been adjusted against other incomes. The Tribunal concluded that the AO's reliance on the Special Bench decision in Goldmine Shares and Finance Pvt. Ltd. was misplaced, as that decision pertained to a period before the amendment. The Tribunal also distinguished the facts of the case from those in Pidilite Industries and Hyderabad Chemical Supplies Ltd., noting that the latter cases dealt with pre-amendment scenarios. Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IA was allowable from the profits derived from the windmill unit starting from A.Y. 2009-10, as chosen by the assessee. The earlier year losses could not be set off against the profits of the eligible unit for the chosen initial assessment year. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Assessee was allowed. Order Pronounced: The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 11th February 2015.
|
