Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (7) TMI 609 - AT - Income TaxDepreciation on goodwill account - CIT(A) allowed the claim - as per revenue the company has issued 74,26,950 equity shares of ₹ 10/- each to the shareholders of J.K. Synthetics Ltd. (hereinafter called in short as JKSL) free of cost by debiting to goodwill account and the company has created goodwill account and declared it in fixed assets as per schedule IV to the annual report of the company - Held that - First of all the cost of shares allotted to the shareholders of JKSL is part of payment of purchase consideration towards the cost of acquisition of cement undertaking on which assessee is eligible for depreciation. Even in the alternative, if the cost of shares allotted to the shareholders of JKSL is considered to be the cost of goodwill acquired by the assessee, as it was shown as part of means of finance, even then it is eligible for depreciation in the light of the judgments of Areva T and D India Ltd. vs. DCIT (2012 (4) TMI 79 - DELHI HIGH COURT) where in HC examined this issue in the light of legal provisions of the Act and various judgments of the Hon ble Apex Court and finally concluded that specified intangible assets acquired under slump sale agreement were in the nature of business or commercial rights of similar nature specified in section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and were accordingly eligible for depreciation and also confirmed by the Hon ble Apex Court. Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that the ld. CIT(A) has rightly adjudicated the issue and we do not find any infirmity therein. Also see CIT vs. Manipal Universal Learning Pvt. Ltd. (2013 (7) TMI 169 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ) by holding that Explanation 3 to section 32(1) of the Act defines expression asset to include intangible asset like goodwill and goodwill is an asset under Explanation 3(b) to section 32(1) of the Act, therefore, depreciation is allowable even on the goodwill. - Decided against revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in directing the Assessing Officer to allow depreciation on the amount of Rs. 7,42,69,500. 2. Whether the issuance of shares to the shareholders of JKSL as part of the acquisition cost qualifies for depreciation. 3. Whether goodwill qualifies as a depreciable asset under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in directing the Assessing Officer to allow depreciation on the amount of Rs. 7,42,69,500: The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in law and on facts by directing the Assessing Officer to allow depreciation on Rs. 7,42,69,500. The amount represented the issuance of 74,26,950 equity shares of Rs. 10 each to the shareholders of JKSL, debited to the goodwill account. The Tribunal had previously reversed the CIT(A)'s order, but the High Court of Allahabad set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the case for fresh consideration. 2. Whether the issuance of shares to the shareholders of JKSL as part of the acquisition cost qualifies for depreciation: The assessee argued that the issuance of shares was part of the purchase consideration for acquiring the cement undertaking from JKSL, and thus, depreciation should be allowed on this amount. The CIT(A) agreed, stating that the issuance of shares was part of the cost of acquisition of the cement undertaking and hence eligible for depreciation. Alternatively, even if considered as the cost of goodwill, depreciation should still be allowable under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 3. Whether goodwill qualifies as a depreciable asset under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961: The Tribunal examined various judgments, including the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Smifs Securities Ltd., which held that goodwill is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32. The Delhi High Court in Areva T and D India Ltd. vs. DCIT and the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. Manipal Universal Learning Pvt. Ltd. also supported this view. The Tribunal concluded that goodwill falls under the expression "any other business or commercial rights of similar nature" in Explanation 3(b) to Section 32(1) of the Act. Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming that the issuance of shares as part of the acquisition cost qualifies for depreciation. Even if considered as goodwill, it is eligible for depreciation under Section 32. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s orders for both years. The judgment was pronounced in the open court.
|