Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + SC Income Tax - 2015 (8) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (8) TMI 621 - SC - Income Tax


Issues:
- Interpretation of Section 234B of the Income Tax Act regarding the automatic levy of interest for default in payment of advance tax.
- Whether the Form I.T.N.S. 150, containing the calculation of interest payable on tax assessed, should be considered part of the assessment order.
- Application of previous judgments in similar cases to the present scenario.

Analysis:
The Supreme Court judgment addressed a narrow question raised by the Revenue regarding the automatic levy of interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act. The assessment order in question did not explicitly direct the payment of interest, leading to a series of appeals and decisions. The ITAT and the High Court relied on previous judgments, particularly the Ranchi Club Ltd. case, to support their stance that interest was payable. The appellant argued that the interest was part of Form I.T.N.S. 150 and should be considered part of the assessment order. The Court referred to the Kalyankumar Ray case, emphasizing that such forms are integral to the assessment process. The judgment in Ranchi Club Ltd.'s case was a brief dismissal of appeals, while the High Court decision focused on the vires of Sections 234A and 234B, emphasizing that interest should be levied only after final determination of dues.

The crux of the matter lay in the interpretation of Section 234B, which mandates the automatic levy of interest if advance tax is not paid or falls short of the assessed tax. The Court concurred with the appellant's argument that the interest calculation in Form I.T.N.S. 150 is part of the assessment order, as per the Kalyankumar Ray case. Therefore, the Court set aside the High Court judgment and allowed the Revenue's appeal, highlighting the automatic nature of interest levy under Section 234B. The decision in Civil Appeal No. 1198 of 2006 was aligned with the outcome of Civil Appeal No. 1169 of 2006, resulting in both appeals being disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates