2015 (8) TMI 808 - AT - Customs

Condonation of delay - When matters was called, appellants was unrepresented - Since matter was coming up for disposal repeatedly, court decline adjournment and take up appeals for disposal - It seems that appellants was not serious in prosecuting their applications and hence applications for condonation of delay dismissed for non-prosecution - Application and appeal dismissed.

Summary

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed applications for condonation of delay due to repeated adjournments by unrepresented appellants, leading to dismissal of Stay Petitions and appeals. (Citation: 2015 (8) TMI 808 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD)