Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2015 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (8) TMI 1233 - AT - Central Excise


Issues Involved:
Classification of Flexible Intermediate Bulk Containers (FIBC) under Chapter Heading 392090 / 39232990 or 6305 32 00 of CETH.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification Dispute:
The core issue in these appeals is whether FIBC should be classified under Chapter 39232990 as articles of plastics or under 63053200 as textile articles. The Department issued show-cause notices proposing classification under Chapter 3923 2990, but the Commissioner (Appeals) reclassified them under Chapter 6305 3200, leading to the Revenue's appeals.

2. Revenue's Argument:
The Revenue argued that Chapter 63 applies only to made-up articles of textile fabrics, and since FIBC is made from PP strips, it should be classified under articles of plastics (Chapter 392090 / 39232990). They relied on various case laws and a Board's Circular from 1992, which directed classification of HDPE strips and tapes under Chapter 39. They emphasized that FIBC is known in trade parlance as plastic bags and should be classified accordingly.

3. Respondents' Argument:
The respondents countered that Commissioner (Appeals) correctly classified FIBC under 6305 3200, as supported by HSN Explanatory Notes and various circulars and decisions. They highlighted that HSN Notes for Chapter 39 exclude FIBC, while Chapter 63 specifically includes it. They also referenced a Board's Circular from 2011 and a DGFT meeting which classified FIBC under Chapter 63. Additionally, they pointed to a High Court decision and international trade rulings supporting classification under Chapter 63.

4. Tribunal's Analysis:
The Tribunal examined the submissions, HSN Explanatory Notes, and relevant circulars. It noted that the classification issue arose due to export benefits and not due to a demand for duty. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had correctly classified FIBC under 6305 3200 based on detailed analysis and alignment with HSN.

5. Board's Circular and DGFT Clarification:
The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the Board's Circular dated 22.9.2011, which clarified that FIBC made of manmade textile material should be classified under 630502. The DGFT meeting also supported this classification, stating that FIBC is a technical textile and should be classified under ITC (HS) Code 63.

6. High Court and International Rulings:
The Tribunal noted that the Hon'ble High Court had previously ruled that FIBC is classifiable under 6305 3200. Additionally, the US International Trade Commission classified FIBC under 6305320010, further supporting the respondents' position.

7. HSN Explanatory Notes:
The Tribunal highlighted that HSN Explanatory Notes for Chapter 39 exclude FIBC, while Chapter 63 specifically includes it. This alignment with HSN post-2005 further supported classification under Chapter 63.

Conclusion:
Based on the Board's Circular, DGFT clarification, High Court rulings, and HSN Explanatory Notes, the Tribunal held that FIBC is rightly classifiable under 6305 3200. The appeals by Revenue were dismissed, and the cross-objections were disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates