Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (12) TMI 137 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
- Rejection of application for grant of recognition u/s 80G
- Interpretation of objects of the trust as religious in nature
- Discrepancy in treatment of objects under u/s 12AA and u/s 80G
- Compliance with provisions of sec. 80G regarding expenditure for religious purposes

Issue 1: Rejection of application for grant of recognition u/s 80G
The appeal was against the rejection of the application for recognition u/s 80G by the Commissioner of Income-tax. The Commissioner based the rejection on the belief that the trust's objects, particularly clause 13, were religious in nature, citing the Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. case as precedent.

Issue 2: Interpretation of objects of the trust as religious in nature
The assessee argued that the trust was primarily an educational trust promoting Sanskrit, Jain Agama, Siddhant, and Indian philosophy, which did not solely constitute religious activities. The assessee contended that the trust was accepted as a public charitable trust under u/s 12A, and the emphasis on clause 13 alone did not reflect the overall charitable nature of the trust's objectives.

Issue 3: Discrepancy in treatment of objects under u/s 12AA and u/s 80G
The assessee highlighted the discrepancy in treatment between u/s 12AA and u/s 80G regarding the trust's objects. While u/s 12AA recognized the charitable nature of the trust, u/s 80G was denied based on the interpretation of clause 13 as religious. The assessee argued that the trust's objects should be viewed holistically to determine its charitable nature.

Issue 4: Compliance with provisions of sec. 80G regarding expenditure for religious purposes
The learned AR argued that the trust had not incurred any expenditure for religious purposes, meeting the requirements of sec. 80G. Referring to relevant financial details, it was asserted that none of the trust's expenditures were of a religious nature. The argument was supported by the provision allowing up to 5% of total income for religious expenditure under sec. 80G.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal found that the trust's objects were not wholly or substantially religious in nature, as clause 13 did not represent the entirety of the trust's objectives. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order and directed the grant of recognition u/s 80G, emphasizing the need to consider the trust's overall charitable nature and compliance with expenditure provisions. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, highlighting the importance of a holistic interpretation of trust objects in determining eligibility for tax benefits under the Income-tax Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates