Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2016 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (1) TMI 48 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxCancellation of registration certificate - petitioner firm filed incorrect returns declaring taxable turnover as exempted turnover - Held that - Before passing the impugned orders of assessment, the objection letter as furnished by the petitioner on 13.01.2015 and received by the authority on 18.01.2015, has not been considered by the assessing officer. The specific prayer made by the petitioner with regard to supply of certain copies of documents was also turned down by the officer concerned and no such reference is made in the impugned order. - Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), appearing for the respondent would, on instructions, fairly submit that though the objection dated 13.01.2015 was received from the petitioner by the respondent, inadvertently, the same was not considered by him. - Matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues:
Challenging assessment orders for the assessment year 2012-13 and 2013-14, failure to consider objection letter, refusal to furnish copies of documents, setting aside the impugned order, remitting the matter back for fresh assessment. The judgment involves a writ petition challenging assessment orders passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2012-13 and 2013-14. The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing alloy wheels, had its registration certificate canceled but subsequently obtained a new one. The petitioner alleged that incorrect returns were filed due to a notice issued after an inspection, claiming taxable turnover as exempted turnover. The court noted that the objection letter submitted by the petitioner was not considered before passing the impugned orders. The assessing officer also refused to provide copies of documents requested by the petitioner. The court found that the objection letter was not taken into account before passing the order, leading to the impugned order being set aside. The matter was remitted back to the respondent for fresh assessment, with directions to consider all relevant documents provided by the petitioner and give an opportunity to be heard. The assessing authority was instructed to furnish all relevant documents to the petitioner before passing the order at the petitioner's cost. The petitioner was given a deadline to file replies and objections, and the respondent was directed to pass orders within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply would result in the respondent passing orders as directed. No costs were awarded, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
|