Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2016 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (2) TMI 648 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
Violation of conditions of Provisional Duty Assessment Bond under Section 18 of the Act - Penalty imposed under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Reduction of penalty on appeal.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Violation of conditions of Provisional Duty Assessment Bond under Section 18 of the Act
The case involved the import of consignments by the Appellants at Navlakhi port, which were provisionally assessed due to the lack of original documents, chemical test results, and valuation aspects. The goods were allowed clearance based on Provisional Duty Assessment Bonds executed by the Appellants. The Bond required the importer to produce original documents within a specified time limit, failing which the Bond would remain in full force. The Appellants failed to produce the original documents within the stipulated time, despite reminders from the Customs authorities, leading to a violation of the Bond's conditions.

Issue 2: Penalty imposed under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962
The Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Jamnagar, imposed a penalty of &8377; 90,000 on the Appellants for the violation of the Bond's conditions. On appeal, the penalty was reduced to &8377; 45,000 by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Appellants contested the penalty imposition, arguing that there was no intention to evade duty, and it was a technical issue, requesting a complete waiver of the penalty. The Revenue, represented by the Authorized Representative, contended that the Appellants had not complied with the Bond's requirements and had only submitted the documents after a show cause notice was issued, justifying the penalty imposition.

Issue 3: Reduction of penalty on appeal
After hearing both sides and considering the arguments and submissions, the Appellate Tribunal found that the facts were undisputed. While acknowledging the Appellants' negligence in not submitting the documents within the prescribed time or seeking an extension, the Tribunal recognized the need for penalty imposition. However, considering the circumstances, a nominal penalty of &8377; 20,000 was deemed sufficient, leading to a modification of the impugned order to reflect the reduced penalty amount. The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition but reduced it based on the Appellants' plea and the Revenue's arguments.

In conclusion, the appeal was disposed of with the modified penalty amount of &8377; 20,000 upheld by the Appellate Tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates