9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Inclusion of a minor's share of profits in the total income of the assessee for assessment purposes. 2. Interpretation of Section 16(3) and Section 26(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. 3. Impact of a change in the constitution of a firm due to a minor attaining majority. Analysis: Issue 1: Inclusion of a minor's share of profits The judgment addresses the question of whether the sum representing a minor's share of profits in a firm could be included in the total income of the assessee for assessment purposes. The minor, Ashokbhai, had been admitted to the benefits of partnership before attaining majority. Section 16(3) of the Income-tax Act mandates the inclusion of a minor's income arising from partnership benefits in the assessment of the individual. As Ashokbhai was a minor during the relevant previous year and only entitled to partnership benefits, his share of profits had to be included in the assessee's assessment. Issue 2: Interpretation of Section 16(3) and Section 26(1) The crux of the matter lies in the interpretation of Section 16(3) and Section 26(1) of the Income-tax Act. Section 16(3) governs the inclusion of a minor's income from partnership benefits in the assessment of the individual. On the other hand, Section 26(1) deals with changes in the constitution of a firm and the assessment of members in such cases. The judgment clarifies that the assessment of the firm, completed before the minor attained majority, dictates the treatment of profits, emphasizing the importance of the timing of the firm's assessment in determining the constitution of the firm. Issue 3: Impact of a change in firm's constitution Regarding the impact of a change in the firm's constitution due to the minor attaining majority, the judgment highlights that the assessment of the firm was conducted before this change occurred. Therefore, the constitution of the firm for assessment purposes remained the same as when the minor was entitled to partnership benefits. The judgment emphasizes that the material time for Section 26(1) is when the firm's assessment was completed, not when individual assessments were made post the minor attaining majority. In conclusion, the judgment affirms the inclusion of the minor's share of profits in the assessee's assessment due to the minor's status during the relevant previous year. Additionally, it clarifies the application of Section 16(3) and Section 26(1) in determining the treatment of profits in cases involving changes in the firm's constitution. The assessee is directed to pay the costs of the references, with the judges concurring on the answers provided to the questions raised in the references.
|
