9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Assessment of salary received by a member of HUF from a partnership firm in personal assessment or as part of HUF's income. Analysis: The judgment involved the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 for five assessees who were working partners in a partnership firm. The issue revolved around whether the salary received by the working partners should be assessed in their personal capacity or as part of the Hindu Undivided Family's (HUF) income. The partnership deed allowed the working partners to receive a salary, which was disputed by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) who included the salary income along with the share income of the smaller HUFs of the assessees. The Appellate Authority and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal both ruled in favor of the assessees, stating that there was no real and sufficient connection between the investment of joint family funds and the remuneration paid to the working partners. The Tribunal emphasized that the salaries were paid under an agreement and did not adversely affect the interest of the HUF. The Tribunal referred the case to the High Court with the question of law regarding the assessment of salary in the hands of the HUF of the working partners. The High Court, following the precedent set by a Full Bench decision, held that the salary paid to the working partners was not earned by any detriment to the joint family assets and therefore was not assessable as the income of the HUF. The Department's request for a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted by the High Court due to the conflicting views of different High Courts and the Supreme Court on similar issues. Ultimately, the High Court dismissed all cases, answering the question of law in favor of the assessee and against the Department. The judgment highlighted the importance of the question and certified it as a fit case for appeal to the Supreme Court of India. The judgment was agreed upon by both judges, and no costs were awarded in the circumstances.
|
