Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (2) TMI 1397 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
- Allegation of inappropriate and fraudulent Cenvat credit availed by the appellant.
- Failure of the appellant to file a reply to the show cause notices.
- Consideration of extending an opportunity to the appellant for filing a reply and defending the allegations.
- Direction for the appellant to file a reply within a specified period and adjudicating authority to decide the matter following principles of natural justice.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI pertains to two appeals challenging OIO Nos. 19/2011 and OIO-ALW-EXCUS-000-COM-012-14-15. The primary issue revolves around the allegation of the appellant availing inappropriate and fraudulent Cenvat credit. The Tribunal refrains from delving into the merits of the case due to the appellant's failure to respond to the show cause notices, as noted by the adjudicating authority. This failure to provide a reply is deemed highly objectionable by the Tribunal.

The Tribunal, while emphasizing the importance of justice, decides to grant the appellant an opportunity to file a reply to the show cause notice and defend the allegations made against them. It is highlighted that the matter necessitates consideration by the adjudicating authority to ensure a fair and just conclusion. Consequently, the Tribunal directs the appellant's Counsel to submit the reply within four weeks from the date of the judgment.

The judgment concludes with the disposal of the appeals by way of remand, indicating that the adjudicating authority will review the case upon receiving the appellant's reply and reach a decision in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal refrains from making any observations on the merits of the case, keeping all issues open for further consideration during the adjudication process. The order is pronounced in the open court, emphasizing transparency and adherence to legal procedures.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates