1961 (4) TMI 123 - HC - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Admissibility of the last installment of advance tax as a deduction.
2. Deduction of estimated liabilities for income-tax and business profits tax.
3. Deduction of liability for gratuity as per Industrial Court awards.
4. Deduction of provision made for dividends.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Admissibility of the Last Installment of Advance Tax as a Deduction:

The first issue concerns whether the last installment of advance tax (Rs. 2,95,869) paid by the assessee after the valuation date, in accordance with the notice of demand dated October 20, 1956, is an admissible deduction under sections 7(2) and 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court found that there was an existing obligation on the valuation date (December 31, 1956) to pay this amount, even though it was not payable until March 1957. This obligation qualifies as a "debt" within the meaning of section 2(m). Therefore, the court concluded that the amount is an admissible deduction for the purpose of computing the net wealth of the assessee for the assessment year 1957-58.

2. Deduction of Estimated Liabilities for Income-tax and Business Profits Tax:

The second issue is a composite question regarding the deductibility of estimated liabilities for income-tax (Rs. 29,44,421) and business profits tax (Rs. 3,70,083). The court first addressed the business profits tax, noting that the liability for this tax existed prior to the valuation date and thus qualifies as a "debt" under section 2(m). The assessee is entitled to a deduction for this estimated liability, subject to verification by the department.

Regarding the estimated liability for income-tax, the court analyzed whether the obligation to pay income-tax arises at the close of the accounting year or upon the passing of the Finance Act. The court concluded that the imposition of income-tax occurs only after the Finance Act is passed, which is after the valuation date. Therefore, there was no existing liability to pay income-tax on December 31, 1956, and the estimated liability for income-tax does not qualify as a "debt" under section 2(m). The court also rejected the alternative argument that it should be allowed as a deduction under section 7(2)(a), stating that the liability for income-tax does not affect the valuation of the assets of the business.

3. Deduction of Liability for Gratuity as per Industrial Court Awards:

The third issue involves whether the liability for gratuity (Rs. 25,02,675), which arose from Industrial Court awards before the valuation date, is allowable as a deduction. The court noted that the liability for gratuity is contingent upon certain events (e.g., death, retirement, resignation) and is not an existing liability on the valuation date. Since contingent liabilities do not qualify as "debts" under section 2(m), and the liability for gratuity was not shown in the balance-sheet, it cannot be allowed as a deduction under section 7(2)(a). The court concluded that the liability for gratuity does not affect the valuation of the assets of the business.

4. Deduction of Provision Made for Dividends:

Although this issue was not pressed by the assessee, it is noted that the Tribunal had rejected the claim for deduction of Rs. 20,23,500 representing the provision made for dividends to be declared at the next annual general body meeting. This provision does not qualify as a "debt" under section 2(m) and therefore cannot be deducted in computing the net wealth.

Conclusion:

1. The last installment of advance tax (Rs. 2,95,869) is an admissible deduction.
2. The estimated liability for business profits tax (Rs. 3,70,083) is an admissible deduction, subject to verification. The estimated liability for income-tax (Rs. 29,44,421) is not an admissible deduction.
3. The liability for gratuity (Rs. 25,02,675) is not an admissible deduction.
4. The provision made for dividends (Rs. 20,23,500) is not an admissible deduction.

The assessee is required to pay half the costs of the department.

← Previous Next →