9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the issue of deletion of addition made u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act by the learned CIT(A) and the challenge by the Revenue regarding the same. Deletion of Addition u/s 14A: The Revenue contested the deletion of the addition of Rs. 44,15,229/- made on account of disallowance u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act. The crux of the Revenue's argument was that since the assessee made investments in shares out of a bank loan, section 14A should be applicable. The Revenue relied on various decisions to support their stance. On the other hand, the counsel for the assessee defended the impugned order by emphasizing that the cases cited by the Revenue were based on different facts and that the assessee did not show the income as exempt income, especially when substantial funds were available in the capital account. The counsel also highlighted the rule of consistency and presented necessary evidence to support the availability of funds with the assessee. The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and the material on record, noting the earnings by way of interest which exceeded the amount paid to the banks. The Tribunal found no justification for the disallowance and upheld the deletion of the addition. Observations and Conclusion of CIT(A): The CIT(A) had deleted the addition of interest paid to the bank amounting to Rs. 44,15,229/- based on the fact that the assessee had earned interest on amounts given to companies and on FDRs, totaling Rs. 59,44,945/-. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer did not consider the earnings by way of interest, which were more than the amount paid to the banks. This factual aspect was not disputed by the Revenue, and no contrary material was presented. The Tribunal analyzed the assertions made by the respective parties and found a clear discrepancy in the treatment of interest earnings, leading to the deletion of the addition made u/s 14A. Case Laws and Precedents: The Tribunal discussed various case laws cited by both the Revenue and the assessee's counsel to support their arguments. The decisions highlighted by the Revenue were distinguished based on the specific facts of the present case, where the earnings by way of interest exceeded the payments to the banks. The Tribunal also referenced a decision from the Bombay High Court regarding the presumption that investments were made from interest-free funds available with the company when both interest-free funds and loans were present. The application of rule 8D was also discussed, emphasizing the need for a reasonable basis to determine expenditure related to income not forming part of the total income. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the addition u/s 14A. Final Decision: The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, upholding the deletion of the addition made u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 4th September 2012.
|
