2013 (8) TMI 1094 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of expenditure u/s 14A r.w. rule 8D of the IT Rules
2. Disallowance of prior period expenses

Disallowance of Expenditure u/s 14A r.w. rule 8D of the IT Rules:
The Revenue challenged the deletion of disallowance of expenditure amounting to Rs. 13,45,968/- under the head "interest" as per rule 8D of the IT Rules read with section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the arguments of both parties and reviewed the relevant portion of the impugned order. It was noted that the appellant's own funds exceeded the investment made for generating exempt income, indicating the availability of sufficient interest-free funds. The Tribunal found no nexus between the interest expenditure and the investment. Citing the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance of proportionate interest was not justified, and thus upheld the order of the learned CIT(A).

Disallowance of Prior Period Expenses:
Another ground raised was the deletion of prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 1,13,568/- by relying on a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court. The Assessing Officer had disallowed these expenses without recognizing that the liability had crystallized during the year. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and relevant judicial pronouncements, found no error in the order of the learned CIT(A) and upheld the decision. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

This comprehensive judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore addressed the issues of disallowance of expenditure u/s 14A r.w. rule 8D of the IT Rules and disallowance of prior period expenses, providing detailed reasoning and legal analysis for each issue.