1983 (9) TMI 59 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
Whether the sum received on transfer of import entitlements is taxable as income.
Whether the sum received is a capital receipt or a casual receipt.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a reference made by the assessee regarding the taxability of a sum received on the transfer of import entitlements. The assessee, registered under the Special Export Promotion Scheme for Engineering Goods, sold its import entitlements during the relevant year for a substantial amount. The assessee argued that the sum received should not be taxable as it was a capital receipt or a casual receipt. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) rejected this contention, leading to subsequent appeals by the assessee.

The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) and the Tribunal also ruled against the assessee, holding that the sum received was connected with the assessee's business and constituted income. The Tribunal specifically noted that the sum was not of a casual and non-recurring nature. The court referred to a previous judgment in Metal Rolling Works Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT, where it was held that amounts realized from the sale of import entitlements were profits of the assessee's business and not capital receipts or casual receipts. The court emphasized that the import entitlements were obtained directly in the course of the assessee's business, making the sum taxable as business income.

In contrast, the assessee relied on CIT v. Modiram Laxmandas (P.) Ltd., which dealt with the taxability of profits arising from the transfer of quota rights and import licences. However, the court distinguished this case from the current matter, stating that the judgment in Metal Rolling Works Pvt. Ltd. directly addressed the issue at hand.

Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming that the sum received on the transfer of import entitlements was taxable as the assessee's income from business. The assessee was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the Revenue.