Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 1914 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1914 (3) TMI 3 - HC - Indian Laws

Issues:
- Interpretation of limitation period for execution of decree
- Effect of dismissal of appeal to His Majesty in Council on limitation period
- Application of Indian Limitation Act, 1877

Interpretation of Limitation Period for Execution of Decree:
The case involved an appeal from a decree of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which dismissed an application for execution of a decree from 1898. The Subordinate Judge held that the period of limitation ran from the dismissal of the appeal to His Majesty in Council, and since the terms of the decree were not complied with within the extended time, the suit stood dismissed. The High Court upheld this reasoning without considering the question of limitation.

Effect of Dismissal of Appeal to His Majesty in Council on Limitation Period:
The dismissal of the appeal to His Majesty in Council for non-prosecution was under Rule 5 of the Order in Council of 1853, which resulted in the appeal being dismissed without further order. The application for execution was made after the expiration of the limitation period prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1877. The absence of a final order from His Majesty in Council dismissing the appeal did not affect the limitation period for the execution.

Application of Indian Limitation Act, 1877:
The Privy Council held that the application for execution was barred by limitation as per Article 179 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1877. The dismissal of the appeal to His Majesty in Council did not constitute a final decree or order, and the application should have been dismissed accordingly. The Privy Council advised that the appeal be dismissed, with costs to be borne by the appellant. The judgment focused on the strict application of the limitation period and the consequences of non-compliance, ultimately upholding the dismissal of the application on grounds of limitation.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates