Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2014 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (6) TMI 1026 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
1. Recall of winding up order sought by the former Director of the company-in-liquidation.
2. Settlement of dues to creditors by the Director.
3. Official Liquidator's application seeking leave to pay advertisement charges.
4. Claims due and payable by the company-in-liquidation.
5. Settlement of dues with Hescom.
6. Disposal of Company Petition and Official Liquidator's application.

Analysis:
1. The judgment pertains to a case where the former Director of a company-in-liquidation filed an application (C.A.No.97/2013) seeking the recall of the winding up order dated 09-10-2002 passed in Company Petition No. 105/2001. The application mentioned the settlement of the amount due and payable by the company to the creditors.

2. The Official Liquidator also filed O.L.R.No.241/2014 seeking permission to pay advertisement charges to Indo Aryan Publicity. It was noted that the only outstanding dues were to Hescom, Ghataprabha, and Hescom, Hubli, with no other claims received by the Official Liquidator.

3. Considering the absence of any other claims and the settlement of dues with the mentioned creditors, the Court accepted the Director's statement that other claims had been settled. The creditors did not contest any outstanding amounts, and the Court directed the applicant's counsel to serve Hescom to ascertain if they objected to the winding up order recall.

4. Hescom's representative confirmed a payment of &8377;10,18,335/- and indicated willingness to negotiate any further dues for interest with the Director. It was agreed that any outstanding amount would be recovered before reconnection of electricity, rendering the claim against the company-in-liquidation obsolete.

5. Consequently, the Court allowed the application in C.A.No.97/2013, taking O.L.R.No.241/2014 on record. The amount permitted to be paid to Indo Aryan Publicity was to be deducted from the sum deposited by the applicant, with the balance to be paid accordingly.

6. As a result, C.A.No.97/2013 was allowed, leading to the recall of the order dated 09.10.2002 in Company Petition No. 105/2001. Consequently, both Company Petition No. 105/2001 and O.L.R.No.241/2014 were disposed of as per the judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates