Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2012 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (7) TMI 1099 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Appeal against cancellation of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) by Ld. CIT (A) -1, Thane.

Summary:

Issue 1: Surrender of undisclosed income during search action

The appellant, an individual engaged in money lending, surrendered undisclosed income during a search action u/s.132(4), including unaccounted transactions and investments. The income was declared in the return filed later, and assessment was completed by the AO. Penalty proceedings u/s.271(1)(c) were initiated by the AO, but the appellant claimed immunity under Explanation 5 to sec.271(1)(c). The AO imposed a penalty of &8377; 52,94,190/-, denying the claimed immunity.

Issue 2: Appeal before Ld. CIT (A) and Tribunal

The penalty imposed by the AO was challenged before the Ld. CIT (A), who allowed the claim for immunity under Explanation 5. The Ld. CIT (A) relied on legal provisions and previous court decisions to cancel the penalty. The revenue appealed to the Tribunal, where the Ld. DR supported the AO's penalty, while the Ld. Counsel for the assessee relied on the Ld. CIT (A)'s order.

Issue 3: Tribunal's decision

The Tribunal observed that the undisclosed income was surrendered during the search, declared in the return, and accepted by the AO during assessment. The AO imposed the penalty by denying the immunity under Explanation 5 due to lack of specific details in the statement recorded u/s.132(4). The Tribunal referred to previous court decisions, including the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court and Allahabad High Court, which emphasized substantial compliance with the provisions of Explanation 5. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT (A)'s decision to cancel the penalty, citing the benefit of immunity under Explanation 5 to sec.271(1)(c).

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the cancellation of the penalty imposed by the AO u/s.271(1)(c) by the Ld. CIT (A).

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates