1981 (9) TMI 6 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Allowance of legal expenses claimed by the assessee for different assessment years.
2. Deductibility of a payment of Rs. 30,000 made as per the High Court order.
3. Determination of whether the exhibition of films in three cinema houses constituted one single business or three independent businesses.

Analysis:

The judgment pertains to the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69, and 1969-70, involving the allowance of legal expenses and a payment of Rs. 30,000 by the assessee. The Tribunal allowed the legal expenses incurred by the assessee for defending a suit and the payment made as per the High Court order as business expenditures under section 37 of the Income Tax Act for the respective years. However, the Department contended that as the expenses were related to a cinema vacated in 1964, they should not be considered as business expenditures. The court referred to the principles established by the Supreme Court in L. U. Chhabda and Sons v. CIT regarding the treatment of distinct business sources. The court emphasized that the Tribunal failed to assess whether the exhibition of films in the three cinema houses constituted one single business or three separate businesses. Thus, the court directed the Tribunal to reevaluate the matter in light of the Supreme Court's decision, highlighting the importance of determining the unity or independence of the business ventures to decide on the deductibility of the expenses incurred by the assessee.

In conclusion, the High Court emphasized the need for the Tribunal to reassess the questions raised in the case concerning the allowance of legal expenses and the payment made as per the High Court order. The court highlighted the significance of determining whether the exhibition of films in the three cinema houses constituted one single business or three distinct businesses based on the principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The court's decision underscores the importance of evaluating the facts to ascertain the nature of the business ventures before allowing or disallowing the claimed expenses, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination in line with established legal precedents.