Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (4) TMI 1739 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues involved:
1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Non-payment of outstanding dues by the Corporate Debtor to the Operational Creditor.
3. Admittance of the petition and appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
4. Direction for the Operational Creditor to deposit funds for IRP expenses.

Analysis:
1. The petition was filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution due to the Corporate Debtor's failure to liquidate its outstanding debt towards the Operational Creditor. The Corporate Debtor, engaged in the manufacture and sale of cheese products, had requested the Operational Creditor to supply and install an indexing conveyor belt. Despite multiple demands and legal notices, the Corporate Debtor failed to pay the outstanding dues of ?2,11,102/-, leading to the petition under Section 9.

2. The Corporate Debtor, after receiving the upgraded parts and equipment, acknowledged the receipt but did not clear the dues. The Operational Creditor raised an invoice for the new motor and transportation charges, which remained unpaid. The Corporate Debtor's non-response to the demands and legal notice prompted the Operational Creditor to file the petition, which was duly served to the Corporate Debtor under Section 8 of the Code. As the Corporate Debtor did not contest the petition, they were proceeded ex parte, leading to the admission of the petition.

3. The Tribunal admitted the petition and imposed a moratorium under Section 14 of the Code, prohibiting suits or proceedings against the Corporate Debtor and any alienation of assets. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed to oversee the resolution process. The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit ?2 lakhs for IRP expenses, which would be reimbursed as Corporate Insolvency Resolution costs. The appointed IRP was mandated to comply with the provisions of the Code and file a report accordingly.

4. The Tribunal directed the Operational Creditor to communicate the order to both parties and the IRP. Additionally, the Operational Creditor was instructed to deposit funds for IRP expenses to ensure the smooth continuation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution process. The case was scheduled for further consideration on 10th June 2019 to monitor the progress and compliance with the Code's provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates