9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Petition seeking return of seized gold bars, legality of seizure, satisfaction of Commissioner regarding acquisition of gold bars, appeal against retention of gold bars, lack of response from authorities, challenge to orders before CESTAT, necessity of granting relief. Analysis: The petition requested the return of 78 seized gold bars, weighing 9097.920 grams, seized by authorities in 1998. The petitioner, a gold dealer, claimed the gold was purchased legally. The Commissioner found sufficient evidence for 70 bars but upheld the seizure of 8 bars. The petitioner appealed to CESTAT, which allowed the appeal, stating no link to smuggled gold. Despite orders for return, authorities did not respond, leading to the petition. The respondents argued that challenges were made before CESTAT and further appeals were planned. However, no stay was granted on the orders. Referring to a similar case, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that as no stay was granted on the Commissioner's order or CESTAT's decision, the relief sought should be granted. The court, citing precedent, directed the authorities to return all 78 gold bars within ten working days, emphasizing the lack of stay on the orders challenged before CESTAT. The ruling highlighted the need to comply with the orders issued by the adjudicating authority and CESTAT in favor of the petitioners. Costs were imposed on the respondents.
|
