9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (8) TMI 1900 - HC - CustomsMaintainability of appeal - appropriate forum - section 130 of Customs Act - Benefit of N/N. 21/2002 - import of Crude palm oil - HELD THAT - An appeal, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, lies only if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law - While a feeble attempt is made, by the Learned Counsel for the appellant, to submit that the carotenoid value would deplete over a period of time, this Court would not be justified in examining these disputed questions of fact, for it is only if a substantial question of law arises for consideration, can an appeal be entertained under Section 130 of the Customs Act. There are no no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal - appeal dismissed.
Issues:
1. Interpretation of Customs Act regarding exemption eligibility criteria for imported crude palm oil. 2. Consideration of Chemical Examiner's report and Port Health Officer's certificate in determining compliance with notification requirements. 3. Assessment of substantial question of law for appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act. Issue 1: Interpretation of Customs Act regarding exemption eligibility criteria for imported crude palm oil: The appeal challenged the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which allowed the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Customs' decision regarding the eligibility of imported crude palm oil for exemption under a notification. The Tribunal, citing a previous decision, held that the carotenoid value of the imported crude palm oil was below the prescribed limit of 500-2500 mg per kg, making it ineligible for the notification's benefit. This decision was based on the specific requirements outlined in the notification related to acid value and carotenoid content. Issue 2: Consideration of Chemical Examiner's report and Port Health Officer's certificate in determining compliance with notification requirements: In the case of Arani Agro Oil Industries Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized that compliance with the notification's conditions was crucial for exemption eligibility. The Chemical Examiner's report indicated that while the acid value met the specification, the carotenoid value fell short of the required range. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the carotenoid value could decrease over time and highlighted that no retesting was requested by the appellants. This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court, reinforcing the importance of meeting the specific criteria outlined in the notification. Issue 3: Assessment of substantial question of law for appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act: The High Court emphasized that for an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act to be entertained, a substantial question of law must be involved. The appellant's contention regarding the potential depletion of carotenoid value over time was deemed insufficient to constitute a substantial legal question. Therefore, the Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal's order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs. In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision based on the clear requirements set out in the notification for exemption eligibility, emphasizing the importance of meeting the specified criteria. The judgment highlighted the need for a substantial legal question to entertain an appeal under the Customs Act, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal in this case.
|
