9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Addition towards deferred income 2. Disallowance of provision for doubtful debts 3. Disallowance of management expenses 4. Addition towards reversal of income 5. Disallowance u/s 14A 6. Determination of losses to be carried forward Summary of Judgment: 1. Addition towards Deferred Income The first common issue in the grounds of all these appeals relevant to the assessment years 2002-03, 2006-07 to 2008-09 is that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the addition made towards deferred income. The Tribunal referenced the Chennai Special Bench decision in the case of ACIT v. Mahindra Holidays & Resorts (India) Ltd., which held that the entire amount of timeshare membership fee receivable by the assessee up front at the time of enrolment of a member is not the income chargeable to tax in the initial year due to the contractual obligation to provide services in future over the term of the contract. Hence, the issue was decided in favor of the assessee. 2. Disallowance of Provision for Doubtful Debts For the assessment year 2006-07, the assessee's counsel submitted that this ground of appeal is not pressed. Accordingly, the ground of appeal raised on disallowance of provisions for doubtful debts is dismissed as not pressed. 3. Disallowance of Management Expenses The Assessing Officer disallowed 50% of the increase in management expenses incurred by the assessee on the ground of substantial increase compared to the preceding year and a reduction in income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed this disallowance. The Tribunal, however, found that the management fee was directly linked to resort income, which had actually increased. Therefore, the disallowance of Rs. 55,49,807/- on account of management expenses was deleted. 4. Addition towards Reversal of Income For the assessment year 2007-08, the Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 1,31,51,275/- due to the provision for expenses made on 31.03.2007 and reversed on 01.04.2007. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed this disallowance. The Tribunal restored this issue to the file of the Assessing Officer to examine the additional evidence produced by the assessee. 5. Disallowance u/s 14A For the assessment year 2002-03, the Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 11,00,577/- u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) restricted the disallowance to 2% of the dividend earned, but since there was no dividend income, the Tribunal dismissed the grounds of appeal of the assessee on this issue. For the assessment year 2008-09, the Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer to decide afresh in light of the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. 6. Determination of Losses to be Carried Forward For the assessment year 2008-09, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) sustained the order of the Assessing Officer in determining the losses to be carried forward at Rs. 53,06,83,140/- as against Rs. 138,01,61,035/-. The Tribunal set aside the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer to re-examine and determine the correct losses to be carried forward. Conclusion The appeals of the assessee in I.T.A. Nos. 471 & 472/Mds/2012 are partly allowed, and I.T.A. Nos. 473 & 160/Mds/2012 are partly allowed for statistical purposes. The order was pronounced on Thursday, the 30th of August, 2012, at Chennai.
|
