Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases SEBI SEBI + AT SEBI - 2018 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (3) TMI 1830 - AT - SEBI


Issues:
1. Rejection of claim by the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) regarding margin money provided to a defaulter stockbroker.
2. Interpretation of margin money as loans and its implications on compensation claims.
3. Duty of NSE in regulating brokers and compensating investors for broker failures.

Analysis:

Issue 1: The appellant challenged the rejection of their claim by NSE regarding margin money provided to a defaulter stockbroker, Kassa Finvest Private Ltd. The claim was denied on the basis that the amount provided as margin money was considered a transaction in the form of loans, not eligible for compensation from the Investor Protection Fund (IPF) of NSE.

Issue 2: The appellant argued that they were a small investor who had opened a trading account with Kassa and transferred shares, expecting returns. However, when the committed returns were not received, and NSE expelled Kassa for violations, the appellant sought a refund of the margin money. NSE's Defaulters' Committee rejected the claim, citing by-laws that prohibit compensating claims in the nature of loans from the IPF. The financial ledger of Kassa indicated interest payments to the appellant, supporting the view that the margin money was in the form of loans, not eligible for compensation.

Issue 3: The appellant contended that NSE failed in its duty to regulate brokers properly, leading to the appellant's loss, and sought compensation. The tribunal, however, found that NSE was not liable to compensate for the willful violation committed by the appellant and the broker. The tribunal referred to a previous related appeal where a similar argument was rejected, emphasizing that NSE, as a first-line regulator, is not obligated to compensate for violations. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the appellant could pursue the claim against Kassa through the appropriate forum if necessary.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates