9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment addresses four questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench: 1. Depreciation claim on capital assets used for scientific research. 2. Admissibility of surtax as a deduction in computing total income. 3. Allowability of interest payable under section 220(2) of the Income-tax Act. 4. Applicability of section 40A(5) to remuneration paid to directors. Depreciation on capital assets for scientific research: The assessee claimed depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act for capital assets used in scientific research during the relevant year. The Tribunal upheld the claim based on a previous order but noted that an amendment to section 35 made the assessee ineligible for relief post the purchase date of the assets. Thus, the claim was disallowed in favor of the Department. Surtax as a deductible item: The Tribunal disallowed the deduction of surtax payable under the Companies Profits Surtax Act, 1964, in computing business profits. The assessee argued that surtax is a separate tax on chargeable profits, not akin to income tax. However, the court held that surtax is an additional tax on business profits and not an allowable deduction under the Income Tax Act. Interest payable under section 220(2): The disallowance of interest paid under section 220(2) as a deduction in computing total income was confirmed by the Tribunal. The court, citing precedents, emphasized that interest on delayed tax payment is not incurred for business purposes and hence not an allowable deduction. Applicability of section 40A(5) to director's remuneration: Based on a previous decision, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the applicability of section 40A(5) to the remuneration paid to directors of the company. This judgment clarifies the treatment of depreciation, surtax, interest payable, and director's remuneration in the computation of total income, providing insights into the legal framework governing such deductions and liabilities.
|
