9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of provisions under section 88(5)(iii) and section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Determination of eligibility for rebate under section 88 and deduction under section 80G based on donations made to a trust. Analysis: The judgment delivered by the High Court of Madras involved interpreting the provisions of section 88(5)(iii) and section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court was presented with two questions relating to the eligibility of a trust, S. Rm. M. CT. M. Tiruppani Trust, for rebate under section 88 and deduction under section 80G for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69, respectively. The Tribunal had to determine whether the trust fulfilled the conditions laid down in the respective sections for the donations made by the assessee to qualify for the rebate or deduction. The Tribunal's decision was based on the trust deed of S. Rm. M. CT. M. Tiruppani Trust, which indicated that the trustees had discretion to utilize the trust's income for repairing old Hindu temples or establishing facilities for Hindu temples, schools, etc. The Tribunal found it challenging to establish a direct connection between these activities and the benefit to any specific religious community or caste. The revenue's counsel argued that the repair and renovation of Hindu temples exclusively benefited the Hindu community, thus disqualifying the donations for rebate under section 80G(5)(iii). However, the court refrained from expressing an opinion on this argument due to its proposed course of action. A significant issue arose as the Tribunal failed to provide a copy of the trust deed in question, leading to an incomplete consideration of the trust's objectives. Both parties later produced copies of the trust deed, revealing additional objects that were not specific to any religious community or caste. The court emphasized that the entire trust deed, including all its objectives, must be evaluated to determine eligibility under section 80G(5)(iii) along with Explanation 3. Consequently, the court found it impossible to answer the questions without a comprehensive review of the trust deed by the Tribunal. As a result, the court returned the reference without providing answers and directed the Tribunal to reexamine the matter in light of all relevant trust deed provisions. No costs were awarded in this decision.
|
