Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (4) TMI 1858 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
Challenging order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 regarding deletion of addition made on purchases treated as bogus and non-genuine.

Analysis:
1. Grievances Raised:
The appeals and cross objections contested the order deleting the addition on purchases treated as bogus and non-genuine. The issues raised included the CIT(A) allegedly erring in law and fact by not appreciating the case's facts and material properly, and the demand for restoration of the Assessing Officer's order.

2. Application of Profit Percentage:
The Tribunal noted that the issue was covered by High Court judgments, allowing a profit percentage of 12.5% in cases of such bogus purchases. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision based on sufficient evidence from the Sales Tax Department regarding the parties involved in issuing bogus bills for materials.

3. Detailed Analysis of Purchases:
The appellant's purchases from parties involved in issuing bogus bills were specified for each assessment year. Despite the bills being found bogus, the appellant reconciled purchases with material consumed, showing consistent GP ratios in earlier years. The appellant's reconciliation of material purchased and consumed indicated genuine transactions, supported by regular purchases and payments to suppliers.

4. Judicial Precedents and Conclusion:
The Tribunal relied on various High Court judgments to support the application of a profit percentage on such purchases. The judgments highlighted that only the profit element embedded in the purchases should be added to the assessee's income, not the entire purchase amount. The Tribunal approved the CIT(A)'s decision based on the absence of contrary decisions and dismissed the appeals and cross objections.

5. Final Decision:
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and cross objections, affirming the CIT(A)'s conclusions and declining to interfere. The cross objections were dismissed due to lack of prosecution. The judgment was pronounced on April 5, 2019, in line with the High Court's established views on the matter.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates